Monday, July 18, 2011

FALSE STATEMENTS BY MR. EDDINS, THE STATE ATTORNEY, AND MR. STEWART, FBI, PENSACOLA

Pensacola City Officials appear to be in violation of City Ordinances, State Statutes and Federal Regulations in regard to the illegal closing, without due process, of our authorized business on March 19, 2005, which is still closed to this day. These apparent illegal/criminal actions should be stopped immediately and charges should be brought against those involved in the apparent illegal/criminal actions against us but all agencies I have contacted refuse to do so.

I wrote the State Attorney, Mr. Bill Eddins and filed a complaint against Pensacola City Officials for apparent illegal/criminal actions in closing our authorized business without due process, keeping us closed by apparent extortion and denying us the income from our investment property, apparent grand theft against persons 65 years of age and older.

Mr. Eddins chose to send my complaint to Mr. John DuBose in the Consumer Fraud Unit instead of the Criminal Investigation Department. On May 22, 2008, Mr. DuBose wrote: “The complaint you have submitted is not actionable by our office since it has previously been reviewed by the Office of State Attorney, determined not to be criminal, is outside the Statute of Limitations and appears to involve a private civil dispute not a public interest. Accordingly, we will be closing the file.”

I wrote Mr. James Casey, Special Agent in Charge, at the Jacksonville Office of the FBI and filed a complaint against the Florida State Attorney, Mr. Eddins, the FDLE and Pensacola City Officials for apparent illegal/criminal actions in closing our authorized business without due process, keeping us closed by apparent extortion and denying us the income from our investment property and the refusal of the Mr. Eddins, State Attorney, and the FDLE to stop the apparent illegal/criminal actions against us, indicating probable government corruption.

Mr. Casey chose to send my complaint to Mr. James Stewart, Supervisory Senior Resident Agent, Pensacola Office of the FBI. On September 22, 2009, Mr. Stewart wrote:
“The FBI has reviewed all the documents you have sent via US Mail and e-mail since July 2009. However, this matter is outside the jurisdiction of the FBI and beyond the Statute of Limitations.
The complaint is not actionable and does not show evidence of criminal wrongdoing and appears to involve a private civil dispute. Therefore, the FBI will not be initiating an investigation.
The FBI is authorized to investigate state and local government corruption however, the complaint, as received, does not indicate criminal intent on the part of the parties you have identified. . .”

It appears that neither Mr. Casey nor Mr. Stewart read my documentation but contacted the State Attorney, Mr. Eddins, as the letter from the FBI is filled with false statements and is almost identical to the letter we received from the State Attorney and does not address illegal actions documented in my correspondence.

Both the State Attorney and the FBI say that the matter is outside of their jurisdiction but that is not true. We are in the jurisdiction of the State Attorney and we furnished extensive documentation to show that Pensacola City Officials had acted illegally in closing us down. Since our business had operated for over 25 years, with no complaints from neighbors, the City, nor clients, and had been closed down by three Pensacola City Departments, without due process, within 48 hours the day before Pensacola City Officials announced they were building a 40 million dollar maritime park at the end of our street, a conspiracy of government officials (corruption) appears to be in evidence. The FBI is tasked with investigating state and local government corruption and the apparent illegal/criminal actions against us appear to indicate criminal intent and actual criminal actions on the part of the parties we have identified. Both Mr. Casey and Mr. Stewart refused to do so.

Both the State Attorney and the FBI said that the matter is beyond the Statute of Limitations which is a false statement. Since this matter is ongoing, to this very day, the Statute of Limitations has not even started, much less expired. This is only an excuse to refuse to investigate public corruption. These are the only two agencies that cited Statute of Limitations as an excuse to do nothing and both are wrong, as I wrote and told them, since the apparent crimes committed against us are ongoing. Mr. Casey and Mr. Stewart, the FBI, ignored my letters where I pointed this out and did not respond. Mr. Eddins also ignored my pointing out that the Statute of Limitations had not expired and had not even begun as the apparent crimes were ongoing. He, too, did not respond.

Both the State Attorney and the FBI said that the matter is a private civil dispute not a public interest. It seems to me that our situation is exactly what the public is currently clamoring about and they are demanding that government corruption be properly investigated and stopped.

Both the State Attorney and the FBI said that the matter is “not actionable” which is not true unless you want to protect and cover-up government corruption.

Both of these agencies, plus FDLE, should be thoroughly investigated for making false statements about this matter to avoid taking proper action thereby leaving us, an elderly couple, helpless, to continue being victimized by corrupt officials.

The letters from the State Attorney’s office and the FBI are attached.
Photobucket

Photobucket